In fact, the i7 tends to win most of the benchmarks we ran on our review units, as you can see below. We’ve also confirmed these findings in the more taxing Cinebench R23 test, in which case the CPUs ended running at the same 74+W and 79+W sustained TDPs, but in this case, the Intel CPU scored a little higher than the AMD. There are also quieter profiles available in both cases, but those we’re discussing in the A15 vs F15 review article. The temperatures are the same in both cases, in the high-80s. This allows the AMD unit to run slightly quieter, with the fans ramping up to 42-43 dB at head-level, while they ramp to 44-45 dB on the Intel models.
We’re looking at similar performance between the two on the top Turbo profile, but 2-4% higher sustained scores on the AMD model, despite the fact that it runs at lower sustained power of 74+W, while the Intel model runs at 79+W. So with that out of the way, we’ll first touch on the sustained CPU performance in the Cinebench loop test, which runs the same test for 15+ times in a loop, with 1-2 sec delay between each run.
THERMAL PRESET ADOBE PREMIERE PRO DRIVERS
Oh, and we’re also testing these with the same GeForce drivers and Asus software available in each case as of late July 2021. So this is as much of an apples-to-apples comparison of these two processors as it can be. Both are bundled with 16 GB of single-rank dual-channel memory, SSD storage, and the exact same kind of RTX 3060 Laptop dGPUs, and both are the same chassis and almost the same thermal module design. Intel Core i7-11800H vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800H benchmarksĪs mentioned earlier, we’re looking at two identical test laptops here, one built on in Intel Core i7-11800H platform and the other on an AMD Ryzen 7 5800H. These might not matter to most of you, but can make a difference for creators and workloads that would benefit from faster storage, Thunderbolt 4, or QuickSync in let’s say the Adobe suite of programs. Among those, there’s an increased amount of Cache memory, support for faster PCIe gen4 storage and a direct CPU connection for the SSDs, better WiFi 6+ integration, and a couple of Intel proprietary perks, such as Thunderbolt 4 or QuickSync, among others. In general, though, Intel’s 11thn gen processors tend to require a little more power than AMD’s for peak performance, and are also less efficient with daily use, something you should consider if you plan to use the laptop unplugged often.Īt the same time, the Intel architecture benefits from a few technology advancements, mostly because it has been launched a few months after AMD launched their Cezanne architecture. What this means is that not all laptops are created equally and if you’re looking for a computer capable to maximize the performance of these CPUs, you should look into reviews for details on the power settings and how each product fares in demanding loads and games, based on what you’re looking for.īefore we get to talk about some benchmarks and performance numbers on our TUF Gaming samples, I should also add that the fact that Intel is built on a 10 nm lithography and AMD on a 7 nm can be a little misleading, and that’s because you cannot directly compare the technologies used by Intel and TSMC (which makes the AMD processors). The more capable the design and thermal module are, the higher power these processors can run at in sustained loads, and thus the higher the performance they can deliver on. In fact, both these processors run at higher than default TDPs in most modern laptops, and are highly dependant on the power settings applied by each manufacturer, which on their own depend on the internal VRM design of each motherboard and the thermal module that the OEMs opted for. The i7 has on paper a lower Base Clock, but that’s not important, as in real-use frequencies are always influenced by Turbo Boost. So as mentioned already, both these chips are 8C/16T and capable of reaching similar frequencies. Intel Core i7-11800H – Tiger Lake 11th gen
0 kommentar(er)
